Thursday, February 16, 2012

on par and parallel

silver saunterer 
sidle along my rolling stride
peregrine. over stony paths we'll glide

we will amble
scoot, skip, and ramble
evergreen. in devoted loam reside

Tuesday, January 31, 2012

on cultivating attentiveness



I would like to learn how to think better.

(again.)

(still.)

more on this later.

Sunday, January 29, 2012

on a visual conclusion

in his essay "A Body of Broken Bones," Thomas Merton says that the opposite of hatred is not immediately love, but something more fundamental: "It is a prior commandment, to believe. The root of Christian love is not the will to love, but the faith that one is loved."

what function does this sort of love ("irrespective of one's worth!") serve in our lives? I have to reckon that it creates space: it flashes visions in the sky, and draws us upwards into improvement.

God is a blossoming Springtime in the southeast: cool mornings, warm sunlight, after-storm humidity and the break in the clouds. God is gilded trees, lit against a receding storm cloud.

Wednesday, November 30, 2011

on the liberties of a short life

as deaths tend to do, my Dad's death has called to my attention the ultimate shortness of life.

now many things that once seemed to matter don't seem as important.

this loss has drawn me into definition. if something so clumsy and so ugly as death can do that, why do we continuously seek beauty of some padded, unscathed form? that is empty. exhaustible.

I'm finding it easier to be OK with the things that once threatened me. my physical oddities, for instance. my perpetual longing to be a smaller, more petite woman is more easily discarded lately. what an arbitrary, irrelevant wish. we all have bodies--we are all biological beings, and remain inescapably subject to this fact. sometimes people are small. sometimes people are tall and rangy. sometimes blood vessels burst in their brains and they are snatched away abruptly while their dearly loved ones stand nearby helpless. which among these is more significant and startling?

it's a matter of scale, really. life has deeper depths than I ever thought and they make themselves known to me, simultaneously causing all of those other presumptuous facets to pale and wither in comparison. they flake off like old scabs we brush off once better skin has emerged.

these are thoughts I may develop more another time; this might be amended with an edit.

Sunday, November 13, 2011

on what is to be done

to do


graduate from ncsu with a major in psych, minor in agroecology having completed psy 499 (research w/faculty).


... all the while taking my farm job seriously, regarding it not merely as a means of income but an opportunity to gain a great deal of information and experience about sustainable agriculture.


develop as a pencil artist to the point where it may be an additional means of income.


co-manage the ncsu s.o.u.l. garden cooperatively, efficiently, and effectively, helping it to achieve its full potential and serve the ncsu community while also regarding it as an opportunity to develop skills in logistical planning and working with others in a cooperative and goal-oriented way.


pay off my undergraduate loans (approx. $22,000 worth by the time I graduate) while cultivating an attitude of peace and acceptance, knowing that hard work and a humble lifestyle is not only necessary but beneficial.


go to grad school for environmental psychology?

Tuesday, October 4, 2011

on the deepening and clarifying of love


I'm thankful for loving & attentive family and friends. thankful for my siblings' presence and my mom's resilience. thankful for garden work, school work, and the comfort of routine.

I am thankful, too, for warmth, sunlight, clouds, our cats, our dogs. thankful for quietness, for darkness, and solitude, and blankets.

for those of you who can only manage to say "this is awful, I'm so sorry" - you're right. it is awful, and I'm sorry, too. thank you for acknowledging it for what it is. for those of you who will say "it's going to be okay, in time," I'm taking your word for it, because I've never lost someone this close to me, or this suddenly. for those of you who have made me laugh, and looked me in the eye, held me, and done nice things, thank you. all of those little instances make a big difference.

in some ways this feels like a crescendo of a season of losses. in my mind the tokens of childhood have been snatched away at a slow and steady rate, like the bitter beating on an ancient drum. our old dogs, the house, the horses, gone. but my very father?

like the rest of my family and many others who knew and loved my dad, my emotions go from shock to despair to acceptance and back again. but here's the deal: I don't really know what I am accepting.

my dad's death is, for now, the rub. it is the crux of things. my family was one thing before saturday evening and it is something else now.

it's pretty hard to believe that I'm only three days in.

interestingly, this line from Wendell Berry's short story Fidelity has been on my heart ever since I first heard of my dad's condition: 

She thought it strange and wonderful that she had been given all these to love. She thought it a blessing that she had loved them to the limit of her grief at parting with them, and that grief had only deepened and clarified her love.

my goofy, capable, warm, affectionate, humble father has been taken from us. his death has not merely opened up a gaping hole but rather, a new dimension. I will be exploring it for the rest of my days.

so, I am thankful for all of those things I mentioned above. but most of all I am thankful for my father. 

Sunday, August 14, 2011

on love, of all things

I am the youngest of three daughters--closer in age and life experiences to my sisters than my parents, but closer to my parents (until recently) in proximity. these days I wonder if that position in the sociology of my family has contributed to my inclination to want to meet many people and know how they tick.

among my sets of older friends I play the role of "little sister." this is not contrived--it is more natural than anything, but though it comes easily I can still recognize its advantages: there is less pressure to know, behave, and understand things on the level of my friends in their mid to late 20's and 30's (or beyond!) but I  still may be included in hangouts and happenings on a level with which everyone is pretty comfortable. it's fine--it's great, really. I have my friends of similar ages and experiences to me and we can mouth off, call the shots, assert ourselves, and generally enjoy the safety of sharing the same latitude in life. we may as well enjoy these years of hypotheticism (which is evidently not a word, but I'm going with it) while we can. it won't last forever, at least not to such a grand scale as we currently enjoy, but is is our necessary prerogative to explore haphazard ideas of how the world may be and should be before having to reckon with how it actually appears to be.

one of the cool things about having older friends is that I can toggle between doing silly things with youngsters (or older friends who act like youngsters) and then engage in reflective dialogue with my dear buddies who have gone through the motions and grown out of them. today I spent some time fishing with my best friend. he asked me if I could see why he doesn't care for going out to crowded bars and running around town. absolutely, I said--I always could, but there's plenty to be said for a little healthy dabbling in the common habits of city culture. yet already I have grown weary of the anxiety of being alone in a crowded room, or trying to hold conversations in the places least conducive to conversing, in conditions best suited to alternative forms of relating to people that are quite far from being healthy or beneficial.

it seems like growing up (more importantly, just plain growing) is finding that proper mix of the experiential and the reflective. but I suspect many lack any navigating principles to guide the proportions.  as unsure as I am about matters of my own faith and convictions, I am thankful for the sensibilities that have been instilled in me. my mother emphasized communication and consideration to what I realize all the time was an exceptional degree. my time alone as a homeschooled kid in the country prompted me to fill my time with art, craft, and curious inquiries into animal husbandry, history, science. my early best friends made being friends with the opposite sex no big deal--normal, easy, interesting. and my first regular job opened to me the ever-burgeoning world of agroecology--not to mention the practical value of principles like hard work and attentiveness. sometimes I feel as though I have been a passive participant in my own life and that someone is tending me by introducing joys, challenges and new material at exactly the right times.

sensibilities are not enough, however. for as long as I can remember I have been a little hard on myself by actively questioning my own motivations for my actions or interests. that doesn't mean I always find the answers, or that I do a good job of making adjustments when self-objectivity would seem to doing so. but none the less, I feel I am at least somewhat attuned to changes in my thought patterns, goals or understated intentions. it is disturbing, then, to notice my preoccupations shift from more selfless pursuits to selfish ones.

when I make any effort to trace these shifts to their sources I find that they have much to do with the people I'm spending my time with. no surprise there--so long as my norms are dictated by my society, the closest semblance to living a principled life will be to skim the surface of sensibility or mildly entertained interest, never truly committing to one when things get difficult. I'm at risk of becoming a delightfully likable but ultimately boring and ineffectual person by seeking to toe the line in an effort to be relevant, inclusive... and included. can one be a distinctly principled person, whose "action from principle, the perception and performance of right" makes for good change in the world without compromising my various dear associations and friendships?

perhaps it comes down to the mixture. not surprisingly, I'm reading lots of Wendell Berry these days and he draws a distinction between a community and a public. as it stands, I am (for better or worse) enjoying living in a public where I am comparatively independent from others and need not shoulder the yoke of others' dependencies on me, save for a handful of dear friendships whose requisite needs are welcome and reciprocal. it's a far cry from the communal ideal. but it has its advantages, provided I recognize it as a season in life to be actively encountered and observed but not expected forever. the most significant advantage is that while I function as an individual in an amorphous public I may make community happen on a smaller and deliberate level. still on my terms, and hence still not fundamentally communal, I may currently pick my society and retreat from them when I've had my fill.

yes, it's consumptive and no, it is not ideal. but it is beneficial for the time being--at least for me, considering it as food for thought. the trick will be remembering that even in the smallest pseudo-communities I can be thoughtful and reflective while still offering myself sacrificially to the other(s) involved. a table of fancy friends outside of a bar downtown is not community--it's portion of the public whom I happen to know to some extent. but I may yet offer what can be found within committed community: sincere interest in the welfare of the other, and an honest extension of aid should I be in possession of any aid to offer. jokes, laughs. the boldness to offer a private observation and the patience and warmth to receive the timid confessions of others' observations. commiseration over bad weather, car trouble, busywork or lack of work.

love, so it seems, always finds a way to make room for itself. ah--love, that's a principle. that's a start.